On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:46:51PM +0100, Claudio Bley wrote: > At Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:01:47 +0000, > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > ACK, if you also add the virEventUpdateTimeout method > > OK, but why should I add it? It's useless (for the user) and unused by > the wrapping code. I want to keep the JNA library definition clean -- > e.g. in a later patch I remove all the *UUIDString functions. What makes you say it is useless ? The UpdateTimeout method lets you alter the timeout value for an existing timer, without having to go through Remove+Add of it. This might seem like a subtle distinction, but the difference is that the UpdateTimeout is guaranteed not to fail, where as Remove+Add may fail. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list