Claudio Bley wrote: > At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:19:35 -0700, > Jim Fehlig wrote: > >> Claudio Bley wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley <cbley@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> OK, how about this patch? >>> >>> While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to >>> VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? >>> >>> src/esx/esx_driver.c | 2 +- >>> src/openvz/openvz_driver.c | 2 +- >>> src/phyp/phyp_driver.c | 2 +- >>> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 2 +- >>> src/test/test_driver.c | 2 +- >>> src/vbox/vbox_tmpl.c | 2 +- >>> src/xen/xen_driver.c | 2 +- >>> src/xenapi/xenapi_driver.c | 2 +- >>> >>> >> I think the libxl driver should be included here too. >> > > Seems the libxl driver does not implement the virDomainGetMaxVcpus > function. > Opps, you are right. The libxl driver only has domainGetVcpus. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list