On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:50:42PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:41:21PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > And of course it goes without saying we should never have got into > > this scenario in the first place. We need better testing of QEMU > > binaries to make sure such brokenness can get detected at build > > time. > > To be fair in this case it was because I was cherry picking packages > (qemu) from Rawhide, without updating the whole system. Although if > gluster had symbol versioning, I guess dependencies would have pulled > in the updated glusterfs-libs package too ... Or in the absence of symbol versioning, QEMU's RPM spec must be clear about using a versioned dependancy on gluster, instead of relying just on the automatic ELF deps. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list