On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:23:31PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: > > > I didn't see any edits to cfg.mk; not sure if you were trying 'make > > syntax-check' or if we may have some tweaks to clean up. Oh, and I > > guess you're still waiting on me to find time to tweak upstream gnulib > > to use $(SED) during syntax-check. > > Indeed, I'm waiting for gnulib support for that. Anyway, I keep the > stashed version of that change to cfg.mk to be able to run 'make > syntax-check', but I don't include it in commits because it's a change > on its own and doesn't belong here IMHO. I ran syntax-check against the patch on linux and it passed, so that's fine anyway. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list