On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Il 07/02/2014 11:16, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto: > >> You are not alone. I remember we spent lots of time trying to convince >> Anthony to allow global properties and compat_props affect dynamic >> properties not just static properties, and static properties were a big >> deal due to reasons I didn't understand completely. Now I am hearing the >> opposite message, and I don't understand the reasons for the change of >> plans. I am confused. > > > Picture me confused as well, but at the same I think I understand the > reasons for the change of plans. There's no real convincing. It's just a question of code. There are no defaults in classes for dynamic properties to modify. compat_props are a nice mechanism, making them work for all properties is a reasonable thing to do. Regards, Anthony Liguori -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list