On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:23:46PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/03/2014 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > The project has historically operated as a meritocratic > > consensus based community. Formally document what has > > always been an unwritten assumption amongst the community > > participants. Also include an explicit code of conduct > > to prempt any potential, but unlikely, future problems. > > + <li>User help: join the IRC channel or mailing list to assist or advice > > + other users in troubleshooting the problems they face.</li> > > Here would be an ideal place to add <a href...> pointing to the contact > page, so someone can actually find the IRC channel or list :) Good idea. > > > + <li>Code review: look at patches which are submitted and critique > > + the code to identify bugs, potential design problems or other > > + issues which should be addressed before the code is accepted</li> > > Maybe even mention that merely testing a build with the proposed patch > applied, without actually understanding the code, is also a valid form > of review. I've added another bullet point about testing patches + release candidates. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list