Re: [PATCH] docs: mention maintenance branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/15/2014 07:32 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 14.01.2014 17:53, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Mitre tried to assign us two separate CVEs for the fix for
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047577, on the
>> grounds that the fixes were separated by more than an hour
>> and thus triggered different hourly snapshots.  But we
>> explicitly do NOT want to treat transient security bugs as
>> CVEs if they can only be triggered by patches in libvirt.git
>> but where the problem is cleaned up before a formal release.
>>
>> Meanwhile, I noticed that while our wiki mentioned maintenance
>> branches and releases, our formal documentation did not.
>>
>> * docs/downloads.html.in: Contrast hourly snapshots with
>> maintenance branches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Doc only, so suitable for 1.2.1 if it gets reviewed in time.


> 
> ACK & safe for the upcoming release.

Thanks; pushed.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]