On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Guido Günther <agx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The check for < 0 might be superfluos but freeing num entries instead of > only r ones looks wrong to me since r is the number of allocated names, > not num. I'm happy to send a patch dropping the < 0 part. Oh, bah humbug. Yeah, you are definitely right about that. Please do send a patch with just the num -> r bit. That is definitely a bug. Thanks, Chris -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list