On 12/20/2013 06:59 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/09/2013 04:11 AM, Hu Tao wrote:
>
> <...snip...>
>
>>
>> +static bool
>> +virDomainPanicCheckABIStability(virDomainPanicDefPtr src,
>> + virDomainPanicDefPtr dst)
>> +{
>> + return virDomainDeviceInfoCheckABIStability(&src->info, &dst->info);
>
> Unlike the virDomainRNGDefCheckABIStability() API, the new virDomainPanicCheckABIStability()
> has no checks for !src && !dst
Yay for automated regression testing catching something! And sorry that
I missed this in my initial review. Yes, adding or removing the panic
device is an ABI incompatibility.
>
> I'll put together a patch for this, but figured I'd ask now if there were
> checks that should also be made in the PanicCheck API...
Not really - a panic device has only two properties: existence, and
address (the existence check is missing, which caused the core; but the
address check is already there).
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list