On 12/18/2013 02:06 PM, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:42:25 -0700 > Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> git send-email --in-reply-to='messageid@xxxxxxxxxxx' >> >> for the correct value of messageid. But generally posting a new thread >> is better than threading your v2 to your v1 anyways, as top-level >> threads are easier to spot than a patch nested deep in reply to another >> message. > > Thanks. Should I resend the patch the proper way again? > > Reco We also prefer that patches have authorship attributed to a legal name, rather than a nickname. But rather than resend your patch, I think we should pay attention to Dan's advice - that any solution we come up with that doesn't involve forking a child process, then resetting that child into the correct namespace, is prone to races and therefore does not solve the problem at hand (namely, that symlinks created in the guest namespace must NOT be followed in the parent in host namespace). -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list