Re: Implementation deficiency in virInitctlSetRunLevel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/18/2013 02:06 PM, Reco wrote:
>  Hi.
> 
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:42:25 -0700
> Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> git send-email --in-reply-to='messageid@xxxxxxxxxxx'
>>
>> for the correct value of messageid.  But generally posting a new thread
>> is better than threading your v2 to your v1 anyways, as top-level
>> threads are easier to spot than a patch nested deep in reply to another
>> message.
> 
> Thanks. Should I resend the patch the proper way again?
> 
> Reco

We also prefer that patches have authorship attributed to a legal name,
rather than a nickname.  But rather than resend your patch, I think we
should pay attention to Dan's advice - that any solution we come up with
that doesn't involve forking a child process, then resetting that child
into the correct namespace, is prone to races and therefore does not
solve the problem at hand (namely, that symlinks created in the guest
namespace must NOT be followed in the parent in host namespace).

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]