It makes no sense to go forward to get the parent host number of a HBA, and treat the HBA as a vHBA with trying to delete it. --- src/storage/storage_backend_scsi.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_scsi.c b/src/storage/storage_backend_scsi.c index 1426121..6f86ffc 100644 --- a/src/storage/storage_backend_scsi.c +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_scsi.c @@ -667,6 +667,14 @@ deleteVport(virStoragePoolSourceAdapter adapter) if (adapter.type != VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_ADAPTER_TYPE_FC_HOST) return 0; + /* It must be a HBA instead of a vHBA as long as "parent" + * is NULL. "createVport" guaranteed "parent" for a vHBA + * cannot be NULL, it's either specified in XML, or detected + * automatically. + */ + if (!adapter.data.fchost.parent) + return 0; + if (!(virGetFCHostNameByWWN(NULL, adapter.data.fchost.wwnn, adapter.data.fchost.wwpn))) return -1; -- 1.8.1.4 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list