On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:45:01AM -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 06:21:43PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> This patch series is a followup to > >> > >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-September/msg00413.html > >> > >> to split the python binding out into a separate GIT repository. > >> > >> These patches do not apply to current GIT. Instead you have to first > >> create a new git repo, initializing based on the history of the > >> python/ subdirectory. > > > > I didn't really had time to do the steps below, but a general ACK > > on the direction, it will be hard to really test without having the > > 2 directories and I'm sure something will bite me at the next release > > time, isn't it ;-) ? > > For the python3 patches that I had tried to isolate based on libxml2 > > port I made last year I think it wont be much harder to do on the new > > separate git than currently so that should not get in the way, > > > > IMHO go for it, > > > > Daniel > > I was actually asked by some OpenStack guys to help separate this out > so I'm working from Dan's patches to try to add the pieces we want > before releasing from this route. Yep, the main piece that would be a blocker for OpenStack to use this is the ability to have the python version == x.y.z be able to build against any libvirt <= x.y.z, instead of libvirt == x.y.z Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list