Re: [PATCH 2/3] qemu: Separate calls based on controller bus type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/12/2013 02:30 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On 10/08/2013 02:45 PM, Eric Farman wrote:
For systems without a PCI bus, attaching a SCSI controller fails:

   [root@xxxxxxxx ~]# cat controller.xml
   <controller type='scsi' model='virtio-scsi' index='0' />
   [root@xxxxxxxx ~]# virsh attach-device guest01 controller.xml
   error: Failed to attach device from controller.xml
   error: XML error: No PCI buses available

A similar problem occurs with the detach of a controller:

   [root@xxxxxxxx ~]# virsh detach-device guest01 controller.xml
   error: Failed to detach device from controller.xml
   error: operation failed: controller scsi:0 not found

The qemuDomainXXtachPciControllerDevice routines made assumptions
that any caller had a PCI bus.  These routines now selectively calls
PCI functions where necessary, and assigns the device information
type to one appropriate for the bus in use.

Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  src/qemu/qemu_hotplug.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_hotplug.c b/src/qemu/qemu_hotplug.c
index bc0f57a..70a1b3d 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_hotplug.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_hotplug.c
@@ -365,9 +365,23 @@ int qemuDomainAttachControllerDevice(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
          return -1;
      }
+ if (!controller->info.type) {
+        if (STREQLEN(vm->def->os.machine, "s390-ccw", 8) &&
STRPREFIX(vm->def->os.machine, "s390-ccw") should do the same
Ok

+            virQEMUCapsGet(priv->qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_CCW))
+            controller->info.type = VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_CCW;
+        else if (virQEMUCapsGet(priv->qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_S390))
+            controller->info.type = VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_VIRTIO_S390;
+    }
+
      if (virQEMUCapsGet(priv->qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE)) {
-        if (qemuDomainPCIAddressEnsureAddr(priv->pciaddrs, &controller->info) < 0)
-            goto cleanup;
+        if (!controller->info.type ||
I'd prefer a comparison against VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_NONE instead.
Ok

+             controller->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI) {
+            if (qemuDomainPCIAddressEnsureAddr(priv->pciaddrs, &controller->info) < 0)
+                goto cleanup;
+        } else if (controller->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_CCW) {
+            if (qemuDomainCCWAddressAssign(&controller->info, priv->ccwaddrs, true) < 0)
+                goto cleanup;
+        }
          releaseaddr = true;
          if (qemuAssignDeviceControllerAlias(controller) < 0)
              goto cleanup;
@@ -399,7 +413,8 @@ int qemuDomainAttachControllerDevice(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
      qemuDomainObjExitMonitor(driver, vm);
if (ret == 0) {
-        controller->info.type = VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI;
+        if (!controller->info.type)
Here too.

+            controller->info.type = VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI;
          virDomainControllerInsertPreAlloced(vm->def, controller);
      }
@@ -3024,18 +3039,20 @@ int qemuDomainDetachControllerDevice(virQEMUDriverPtr driver, detach = vm->def->controllers[idx]; - if (!virDomainDeviceAddressIsValid(&detach->info,
-                                       VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI)) {
-        virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED, "%s",
-                       _("device cannot be detached without a PCI address"));
-        goto cleanup;
-    }
+    if (detach->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI) {
+        if (!virDomainDeviceAddressIsValid(&detach->info,
+                                           VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI)) {
+            virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED, "%s",
+                           _("device cannot be detached without a PCI address"));
+            goto cleanup;
+        }
Shouldn't we check if there is either a VIRTIO_S390, VIRTIO_CCW or a PCI address?
Ah, yes. This is true for VIRTIO_CCW, but not VIRTIO_S390. We don't create one on the attach side, and besides the virDomainDeviceAddressIsValid routine always returns true for that type.

I'll send a v2 patch shortly.

- if (qemuIsMultiFunctionDevice(vm->def, &detach->info)) {
-        virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
-                       _("cannot hot unplug multifunction PCI device: %s"),
-                       dev->data.disk->dst);
-        goto cleanup;
+        if (qemuIsMultiFunctionDevice(vm->def, &detach->info)) {
+            virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
+                           _("cannot hot unplug multifunction PCI device: %s"),
+                           dev->data.disk->dst);
+            goto cleanup;
+        }
      }
if (qemuDomainControllerIsBusy(vm, detach)) {

Jan

Eric

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]