On 10/31/2013 06:40 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/31/2013 09:40 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: >> Also try to bind on IPv6 to check if the port is occupied. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025407 >> --- >> src/util/virportallocator.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > Since it is listed as a bugzilla fix, I could probably live with this in > 1.1.4; but it would be nice to get a second opinion (after all, this is > not a regression, so it could be argued that we are finally implementing > a missing feature). > >> fd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); >> if (fd < 0) { >> + if (errno == EAFNOSUPPORT) >> + return 0; > > As to the code, I didn't spot any errors. I do wonder if checking for > EAFNOSUPPORT on every iteration for finding a free port could be made > more efficient by remembering up front if ipv6 is even enabled, and > skipping the attempt in that case (that is, a running system is unlikely > to change which subset of [ipv4, ipv6] that it currently supports except > at boot). But there's probably more in the code base that we could > optimize if we know that a particular family is unsupported for the > given process. > I've tried to check up front if ipv6 is enabled in v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-October/msg00010.html Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list