On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 02:55:04PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Now each security model can define its own base label, that describes > > the default security context used by libvirt to run an hypervisor > > process. This information is exposed to users trough the host > > capabilities XML. > > > > *v3 major changes > > - support LXC > > - merge virSecurityDACSetUser and virSecurityDACSetGroup in > > virSecurityDACSetUserAndGroup > > - DAC sets the baselabel in virSecurityDACSetUserAndGroup > > - Use virDomainVirtTypeToString instead of hardcoding the name > > I've ran a quick smoke test on top of the current HEAD and it seems to > work, can someone please review it or tell me if it makes sense at all > to have this information under "capabilities"? Opps my bad, it was on my todo list to review this, but I totally forgot. Will do it now. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list