On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:35:56PM +0200, Claudio Bley wrote: > At Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:31:48 +0100, > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > > I've also tested your patch, and it seems 256 KB of data is still a > > > bit too large: > > > > > > virsh # screenshot 2 /tmp/test > > > error: could not receive data from domain 2 > > > error: packet 262168 bytes received from server too large, want 262144 > > > > > > The max payload size is computed as: > > > > > > VIR_NET_MESSAGE_MAX = 16777216 > > > VIR_NET_MESSAGE_HEADER_MAX = 24 > > > VIR_NET_MESSAGE_PAYLOAD_MAX = (VIR_NET_MESSAGE_MAX - VIR_NET_MESSAGE_HEADER_MAX) = 16777192 > > > > > > So, it seems the legacy max payload size is actually 262120; I tested > > > it and it works. > > > > > > ------------------- 8< ------ >8 --------------------------- > > > Subject: [PATCH] Adjust legacy max payload size to account for header > > > information > > > Organization: AV-Test GmbH, Germany > > > > > > Commit 27e81517a87 set the payload size to 256 KB, which is > > > actually the max packet size, including the size of the header. > > > > > > Reduce this by VIR_NET_MESSAGE_HEADER_MAX (24) and set > > > VIR_NET_MESSAGE_LEGACY_PAYLOAD_MAX to 262120. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley <cbley@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > src/rpc/virnetprotocol.x | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/src/rpc/virnetprotocol.x b/src/rpc/virnetprotocol.x > > > index 1eae7cb..7b6f753 100644 > > > --- a/src/rpc/virnetprotocol.x > > > +++ b/src/rpc/virnetprotocol.x > > > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ const VIR_NET_MESSAGE_INITIAL = 65536; > > > * payload size. We need to remember this for compat with > > > * old clients. > > > */ > > > -const VIR_NET_MESSAGE_LEGACY_PAYLOAD_MAX = 262144; > > > +const VIR_NET_MESSAGE_LEGACY_PAYLOAD_MAX = 262120; > > > > > > /* Maximum total message size (serialised). */ > > > const VIR_NET_MESSAGE_MAX = 16777216; > > > > Damn, yes, you are correct. The original value was 262120, I > > copied the wrong value. > > > > THe commit which changed it first was > > > > commit eb635de1fed3257c5c62b552d1ec981c9545c1d7 > > Author: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri Apr 27 14:49:48 2012 +0200 > > > > rpc: Size up RPC limits > > > > /* Size of message payload */ > > -const VIR_NET_MESSAGE_PAYLOAD_MAX = 262120; > > +const VIR_NET_MESSAGE_PAYLOAD_MAX = 4194280; > > I amended my commit message referring to Michal's commit > and pushed. > > Are you pushing to the maintenance branches, then? Yep, I'll update them. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list