On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 09:07 AM, Nehal J Wani wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nehal J. Wani reported on IRC a rather interesting build failure:
>>>
>>> In file included from util/virnetdevbridge.c:53:0:
>>> /usr/include/linux/in6.h:30:8: error: redefinition of 'struct in6_addr'
>>> struct in6_addr {
>>> ^
>>>
>
>>> * Makefile.am (SUBDIRS): Put '.' first, not last.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Tough to argue the build-breaker rule on this one, since a
>>> fresh checkout doesn't hit it (only a 'make check' without
>>> a 'make', across an incremental build that happened to need
>>> new configure substitutions). So I'll wait for a review
>>> for my one-liner.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Ping. If there is a specific reason why this was not pushed, I would
>> like to know.
>
> Pong - no one has reviewed it. Did it work for you? If so, state that,
> and your review will serve as enough for me to push it :)
Running 'make' and then 'make check' worked for me. So, I guess there
is no problem in pushing this patch.
--
Nehal J Wani
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list