On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:51:54PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hi Olivier, > this is not really a bug as it's intended. The > libvirt_domain_change_vcpus() is not the same as (yet unimplemented) > virDomainSetVcpus() API so it's not bug. I realize that naming could be > a little confusing so if you like, feel free to rename > libvirt_domain_change_vcpus() to libvirt_domain_xml_change_vcpus() as > this API should be used to change number of vCPUS in the domain XML > itself and implement libvirt_domain_set_vcpus() calling real > virDomainSetVcpus() API function. That function is also buggy in that it will silently turn a transient guest into a persistent guest, which is almost certainly not what a caller would expect Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list