Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] qemu: Remove CPU features functions calling for non-x86 platform.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:28:23PM +0800, Li Zhang wrote:
> From: Li Zhang <zhlcindy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> CPU features are not supported on non-x86 and hasFeatures will be NULL.
> 
> This patch is to remove CPU features functions calling to avoid errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <zhlcindy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> index f8fccea..3b6ba7a 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> @@ -6349,7 +6349,6 @@ qemuBuildCpuArgStr(const virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
>          (def->cpu->mode != VIR_CPU_MODE_CUSTOM || def->cpu->model)) {
>          virCPUCompareResult cmp;
>          const char *preferred;
> -        int hasSVM;
>  
>          if (!host ||
>              !host->model ||
> @@ -6389,10 +6388,13 @@ qemuBuildCpuArgStr(const virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
>          /* Only 'svm' requires --enable-nesting. The nested
>           * 'vmx' patches now simply hook off the CPU features
>           */
> -        hasSVM = cpuHasFeature(data, "svm");
> -        if (hasSVM < 0)
> -            goto cleanup;
> -        *hasHwVirt = hasSVM > 0 ? true : false;
> +        if (def->os.arch == VIR_ARCH_X86_64 ||
> +            def->os.arch == VIR_ARCH_I686) {
> +            int hasSVM = cpuHasFeature(data, "svm");
> +            if (hasSVM < 0)
> +                goto cleanup;
> +            *hasHwVirt = hasSVM > 0 ? true : false;
> +        }
>  
>          if (cpu->mode == VIR_CPU_MODE_HOST_PASSTHROUGH) {
>              const char *mode = virCPUModeTypeToString(cpu->mode);

This bit looks good.

> @@ -10575,7 +10577,9 @@ qemuParseCommandLineCPU(virDomainDefPtr dom,
>                      model = NULL;
>                  }
>  
> -                if (virCPUDefAddFeature(cpu, feature, policy) < 0)
> +                if ((dom->os.arch == VIR_ARCH_X86_64 ||
> +                    dom->os.arch == VIR_ARCH_I686) &&
> +                    virCPUDefAddFeature(cpu, feature, policy) < 0)
>                      goto cleanup;
>              }
>          } else if (STRPREFIX(tokens[i], "hv_")) {

For this, I think we should virReportError() if we find a CPU flag on
the command line for non-x86 arches, instead of silently ignoring it.


I think I'd also like to split this patch in two. I'll apply the first
chunk of it now.

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]