Il 22/08/2013 11:37, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >> No, you're not misunderstanding the discussion. >> >> Depending on the priorities of the pvpanic and legacy-DMA regions, it >> would break DMA channel 0. Channel 0 is (was) used for DRAM refresh, so >> it should not have any visible effect. However, it may not be entirely >> disabling pvpanic, just making it mostly invisible. >> >> Paolo > > Ugh. > > And now that Paolo pointed out that nothing terrible > happens even when migrating from host with pvpanic > enabled to host with pvpanic disabled, I'm inclined > to think we should just disable pvpanic in 1.5.X. > > Thoughts? You'd obviously have no objection from me. Paolo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list