Eric Blake wrote: > Does this patch still apply as is? No, so I just re-submitted a rebased patch-set: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-August/msg00581.html It should be noted that my patches constantly gets in a conflicting state versus your master since they add capabilities, and that seems to be the most rapidly changing place in the code base. Luckily such conflicts are trivial to resolve. In fact, since my second patch submission in May [1], in which I (hope I) fixed all issues found in the review [2] of my first submission in March [3], resolving these types of trivial conflicts is the only thing I've done. [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-May/msg02039.html [2] http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-March/msg01065.html [3] http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-March/msg01051.html > I apologize on behalf of a busy team > that sometimes patches don't get reviewed, and it is okay to send pings > every week or so as needed to spur someone on to looking at it. Ok. Please let me know if there's anything, process-wise, I can do too smoothen this further. Otherwise I'll just continue sending rebased patches as pings every week or two. Cheers! -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list