On 08/09/2013 10:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> I should have looked at the xen code closer. Seems libxl doesn't cope >> well with a NULL logger :(. >> >> Hmm, should the logger for this driver-wide ctx (used for getting libxl >> version and the like, no domain ops) just dump messages to /dev/null or >> should they go to a driver-wide log file? > > Depends if you think there's any useful info to be had from the > driver wide context object ? If so, then probably best to have a > driver-wide log file for those messages Or even just reply the data into the main libvirtd.log (ie. use existing virLog functionality, rather than creating a new file), since ideally the log will be relatively sparse: in my case, it would be just one message stating that libxl is not available, at which point the libxl driver no longer does anything else during the life of libvirtd. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list