On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 09:46:06AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994589 complained that > even when using a cross-compiler not named 'gcc', the configure > output confusingly referred to gcc. > > * m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4 (LIBVIRT_COMPILE_WARNINGS): Use a > more generic statement in configure output. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Pushing under the trivial rule. > > m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4 | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4 b/m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4 > index 8731b70..6bf797f 100644 > --- a/m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4 > +++ b/m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4 > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([LIBVIRT_COMPILE_WARNINGS],[ > > # gcc 4.2 treats attribute(format) as an implicit attribute(nonnull), > # which triggers spurious warnings for our usage > - AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether gcc -Wformat allows NULL strings], > + AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether the C compiler's -Wformat allows NULL strings], > [lv_cv_gcc_wformat_null_works], [ > save_CFLAGS=$CFLAGS > CFLAGS='-Wunknown-pragmas -Werror -Wformat' > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([LIBVIRT_COMPILE_WARNINGS],[ > > dnl Check whether strchr(s, char variable) causes a bogus compile > dnl warning, which is the case with GCC < 4.6 on some glibc > - AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether GCC -Wlogical-op gives bogus warnings], > + AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether the C compiler's -Wlogical-op gives bogus warnings], > [lv_cv_gcc_wlogical_op_broken], [ > save_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS" > CFLAGS="-O2 -Wlogical-op -Werror" ACK. -- Guido > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list