On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 06:59:16AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 07/30/2013 05:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > If libapparmor-devel happens to be installed when building the > > RPM, it will failed due to unlisted virt-aa-helper in %files. > > Add support for apparmor in the spec, so that we can explicitly > > turn it on/off, defaulting to off in all distros. This causes > > --without-apparmor to be given to configure, preventing the > > build failures if the user happens to have libapparmor-devel > > present. > > Makes sense - we want the spec file to be absolute regardless of the > dev's environment. > > Question - is there a repo somewhere with libapparmor-devel built for > Fedora, or does it remain something where I'm best off testing on a > Debian-based build? I took the SUSE libapparmor source RPM and hacked it until it would build on Fedora. Of course you can't actually use it due to missing kernel support in Fedora, but it was good enough to compile libvirt against. Unfortunately I lost the hacked src.rpm I had when one of my dev machines suffered fielsystem data loss :-( It wasn't all that hard to hack the suse RPM though, so ought to be fairly easy to recreate... Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list