On 07/12/2013 11:57 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 07/12/2013 06:35 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 07:55:53PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: >>> Add a new qemuMonitorJSONSetObjectProperty() method to support invocation >>> of the 'qom-set' JSON monitor command with a provided path, property, and >>> expected data type to set. >>> >>> The test code uses the same "/machine/i440fx" property as the get test and >>> attempts to set the "realized" property to "true" (which it should be set >>> at anyway). >>> --- >>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h | 6 +++++ >>> tests/qemumonitorjsontest.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+) >> >> ACK > > Again, shouldn't this function be marked static, and the .h file left alone? > I can go either way on this - without the .h changes, we don't have the test though. So whichever way is preferred - I'll go with it... John -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list