On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:50:29PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > On 07/08/2013 10:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Convert the type of loop iterators named 'i', 'j', k', > > 'ii', 'jj', 'kk', to be 'size_t' instead of 'int' or > > 'unsigned int', also santizing 'ii', 'jj', 'kk' to use > > the normal 'i', 'j', 'k' naming > > Sigh. I actually greatly prefer using ii because a variable named "i" or > "j" is impossible to search for. I guess I'll just live with it though... I figured it was probably some reason like that. I'm afraid though that consistent coding style across the codebase must always win here, and the use of 'ii' style naming was in a small minority. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list