Re: [PATCH] Properly detect VMDK with internal version 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/09/2013 03:44 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On 07/09/2013 03:20 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> Initially proposed as [1], but then changed to comment fix only.  VMDK
>> can have internal version set to 2 when there are few features added
>> which do not affect us.  Thanks to Jan's commit a1ee8e18 this can be
>> easily fixed by adding it to list of supported versions.
>>
>> [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-June/msg00419.html
>>
>> Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836676
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  src/util/virstoragefile.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
> ACK
> 

Thanks, pushed.

Martin

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]