On 04.07.2013 21:46, Jiri Denemark wrote: > Whenever virPortAllocatorRelease is called with port == 0, it complains > that the port is not in an allowed range, which is expectable as the > port was never allocated. Let's make virPortAllocatorRelease ignore 0 > ports in a similar way free() ignores NULL pointers. > --- > src/qemu/qemu_migration.c | 4 ++-- > src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 27 +++++++++++---------------- > src/util/virportallocator.c | 4 ++++ > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) Since making an application to listen on port 0 on Linux is almost impossible I feel confident enough to give ACK. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list