On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:50:08PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: > > On 06/28/2013 01:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:43:44PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: > >> if libvirt doesn't have the tokenizer support yet, it may be a good RFE > >> as I believe it could be really useful ;-) > >> > >> Peter, do you know about anything libvirt supports to tokenize string? > > We have virStringSplit for tokenizing strings which have a fixed > > separator. > > > > > > Daniel > > That sounds good, however what about splitting the function to 2 > separate functions, one accepting the second parameter as the separator, > called e.g. virStringSplitBy() and second just calling the first one > with the fixed separator? > > Wouldn't it be better? That sounds like overkill to me unless we have a clear need for it somewhere in our code. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list