On gio, 2013-06-06 at 15:50 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On gio, 2013-06-06 at 14:59 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> This only really matters if libvirt wants to coexist on a host with > >> toolstacks which use claim, otherwise outstanding pages will never be > >> non-zero. I don't know if coexistence is a goal or not. > >> > >> > > Sure, all this is important only if having it is > > important/interesting... Jim? > > > > It would be preferable if libvirt and xl coexisted nicely. No need for > them to inter-operate (e.g. start a vm with libvirt then manage it with > xl), but managing some with xl and others with libvirt should be a goal, > I think :-/. If nothing else, it seems useful for troubleshooting. I > wouldn't want to advise a user to try xl when things are failing for > them with libvirt, only to find that afterwards their libvirt no longer > worked at all. > Mmm... I'm not entirely sure I understand what you mean by this, but anyway, I just submitted a patch to libxl adding the symbol necessary to determine whether that field is present or not. If it gets accepted, I can then patch libvirt to use it, within the proper #ifdef...#endif block, of course. Thanks everyone and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list