On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 07:53:49PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 13.05.2013 18:09, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 01:17:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> There are various problems building libvirt with clang, > >> which mostly revolve around compiler warning handling. > >> This series fixes all the problems I see with clang > >> 3.2 on a Fedora 19 x86_64 host. > > > > FYI, I measured the following compile times for the src/ > > directory > > > > GCC: 2 minutes 40 seconds > > CLang: 1 minute 50 seconds > > > > So Clang cuts approx 30% off the GCC compile time, which is > > quite nice. I might have to switch to running clang by > > default for libvirt :-) > > > > Daniel > > > > FYI: > > ./autogen --system: 4m40.064s > make -j5 all : 1m22.870s > > so I think compilation is not the major time consumer here :) I run 'autogen.sh' perhaps 2-3 times a day. I run 'make' as many as 10-20 times an *hour*. So yes, compilation is the major time consumer. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list