Re: [PATCH] portability: fix virNetDevSetMAC and virNetDevExists on BSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/11/2013 09:05 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> 
> Eric, thanks for fixing these stupid errors of mine.
> 
> Do you run 'syntax-check' on your FreeBSD vm?

So far, I've just been running it on Fedora.  I suspect that it makes
some GNU assumptions (at least maint.mk comes from gnulib, and upstream
gnulib has already stated that it's okay for maintainer-only tools to
assume "sane" systems, where "sane" excludes anything that requires lots
of porting effort).  That is, while I _know_ syntax-check won't work on
Solaris, I don't know whether the fact that it fails on BSD is
intentional, or something that can be easily fixed with minimal
maintenance nightmares.

> 
> It fails on libvirt_unmarked_diagnostics for me, like this:
> 
> maint.mk: found unmarked diagnostic(s)
> gmake: *** [sc_libvirt_unmarked_diagnostics] Error 1
> 
> Full log here:
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/misc/libvirt_syntax_check.txt

I'll take a look.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]