Re: [PATCH-v5.1] Support for static routes on a virtual bridge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/07/2013 01:42 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
network: static route support for <network>

This update includes Laine Stump's comments/suggestions.  Once
again he has improved my over-engineered solutions.  My original
patch and his patch have been squashed/merged with this being the
result.  That plus a little simplified code added to
bridge_driver.c to handle the zero address situations.

This code does not restrict any combination of
address/netmask/prefix for a static route specification.  The
metric attribute has been added so that existing route specifications
can be overridden.

Documentation has been updated to reflect a v1.0.6 target.
Ping

I believe all issues that can be addressed at this time have been. It is now obvious to me that future work needs to be done to change using command-line commands to using libnl directly.

I would like to get a reading on this sooner rather than later. I also have a pending update for virt-manager which depends on this updated.

Gene

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]