On 05/02/2013 07:56 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/02/2013 07:09 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote: >> 2013/5/2 Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On 05/01/2013 12:44 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote: >>>> --- >>>> src/esx/esx_vi_generator.py | 430 ++++++++++++------------------------------- >>>> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-) >>> >>> My python is weak, so I reviewed this by comparing the generated files >>> before and after this patch; added comments in the generated code are >>> nice, but there are also some added frees. Are these additions >>> intentional to fix a leak, or are they representing a bug in your patch? >>> If intentional, then this is 1.0.5 material if you improve the commit >>> message and push in time; if accidental and no real bug is being fixed, >>> then a v2 should wait until after the release. >> >> The changes in the generated files you're seeing here are intended, >> but they are coming from another patch that I pushed yesterday: >> >> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=4e650435edeb2870c907721ea8b11380256bf6a7 >> >> This refactoring patch should not change the output at all. And it >> didn't in my test. > > Then that must be an effect of me grabbing my snapshot at the wrong > point when swapping between incremental builds. I'll try again, and > sorry for the hassle that my confusion caused... Indeed; once I grabbed the correct diff, I see no change in the output files. And now that the release is out, it's no longer a risk of violating freeze. ACK. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list