Re: License issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/5/1 Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Implementation wise, this would mean that we compile the vbox driver as
> an independent module (much the same as we do for qemu or lxc), and link
> that module into libvirtd rather than into libvirt.so directly.  In
> libvirt.so, attempts to use a vbox:// URI would then be forwarded over
> RPC to libvirtd, instead of directly using vbox code.  vbox would then
> be a remote instead of a local protocol.  Since existing vbox://
> connections are local, vbox users have not previously had to ensure that
> the system libvirtd daemon is running.  Therefore, I suspect that it
> would be nicer to reuse the qemu://session code that auto-spawns a
> session libvirtd, so that from the user standpoint, they can continue to
> connect to vbox without having to have a libvirtd system daemon running.
>  The initial connection time will take slightly longer as a session
> libvirtd is autospawned, but that should not be too much impact.

This will break Virtual Box support on Windows, because libvirtd
doesn't work on Windows yet.

--
Matthias Bolte
http://photron.blogspot.com

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]