On 04/25/2013 09:44 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > I've pushed everything else from all 3 VFIO series. > > Patch 1/4 in this series had questions from Eric about whether it is > the right way to go, or if we want to do something more limited: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg01864.html > > Eric and danpb had both raised issues with Patch 2/4, so I redid it > addressing all the points they brought up, and it's now ready for > review: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg01853.html > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg01869.html > > 3/4 and 4/4 were ACKed, but depend on 2/4, so I couldn't push them. I mixed up the ordering of these in the descriptions above - the cgroup ACL patch was 3/4, *not* 1/4. I just pushed the vir(Process|Command)SetMax(.*) patches, but not the cgroup patch. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list