Re: [PATCH 5/7] conf: spice: Do more automation if autoport is requested

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/24/13 10:42, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:38:26AM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 04/24/13 10:19, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:57:10PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 04/23/13 18:21, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:46:12PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
With autoport enabled, both ports were alocated. With enabling
defaultMode or setting separate channel modes one of the ports may not
be needed. This will allow later on doing this kind of change.
---
  docs/formatdomain.html.in | 2 +-
  src/conf/domain_conf.c    | 5 -----
  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
index 888c005..bb75943 100644
--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
@@ -3470,7 +3470,7 @@ qemu-kvm -net nic,model=? /dev/null
                while <code>tlsPort</code> gives an alternative secure
                port number. The <code>autoport</code> attribute is the
                new preferred syntax for indicating autoallocation of
-              both port numbers.  The <code>listen</code> attribute is
+              needed port numbers.  The <code>listen</code> attribute is
                an IP address for the server to listen
                on. The <code>passwd</code> attribute provides a SPICE
                password in clear text. The <code>keymap</code>

...

If we're allocating ports then we *must* be setting autoport='yes'.
Having port='1' and tlsPort='-1' and autoport='no' is a non-sensical
configuration.

Okay, that is fair enough.

In that case, is it okay not to allocate both ports if the
configuration doesn't require it even if we did so before? Or do we
need to have an option to force allocation of both TLS and non-tls
port even if it's not needed?

Sure, we don't need to allocate both ports, if TLS is disabled in
libvirtd, or if the configuration does not otherwise require it


Great, in that case I'll incorporate the doc hunk from this patch into the next one in this series as that patch makes this change and I'll drop this one.

Peter

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]