Re: new libvirt "pci" controller type and pcie/q35 (was Re: [PATCH 4/7] add pci-bridge controller type)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/16/2013 01:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Can we just leave multi-domains out of this discussion for now. IMHO
> they are just causing more confusion to an already complicated problem.
> Lets focus on just solving the problem of PCI bridges which is what we
> actually need right now.

Sure. I actually find it highly unlikely that anyone will find a true
need for multiple domains in a guest for a very long time.

I summarized in a separate message yesterday what parts of all this are
needed for basic pci-bridge support; the rest (sans multiple domains)
will be needed for q35. As far as I know, everyone is now satisfied with
the result, is that correct?

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]