On 03/23/2013 09:25 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 03/22/2013 06:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:10:45PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>>> When the container has the same '/dev' mount as host (no chroot), >>>> calling domainShutdown(WithFlags) shouldn't shutdown the host it is >>>> running on. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> This is also valid for 1.0.[23]-maint branches, so in case this gets >>>> ACK'd I'll either send a follow-up for those or push it there as well >>>> (if the ACK says so). >>>> >>>> src/lxc/lxc_driver.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >>> >>> ACK, >>> >> >> Thanks, I pushed it to master, how do you (or anyone else) feel about >> the maintenance branches with this patch? >> > > You are welcome to push them into both but the rule of thumb is really > that once a new release goes out the prior one gets no more love, > unless someone steps up that it will be a stable series. The idea > behind the maint branches is really to upstream what the downstreams > do. e.g. We shipped broken Python bindings in 1.0.2 and every > downstream that packaged 1.0.2 would have to carry a patch. But how do > they find out they need to carry that patch if they don't follow the > developer mailing list closely. > I wasn't sure, but since this is not such a huge deal, I will keep it as is. Thanks for the info, now I know for next time ;) Have a nice day, Martin -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list