Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Correctly treat seclabel of type none

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21.03.2013 16:35, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Don't forget other seclabels when adding a <seclabel type='none'/>.
> 
> Michal Privoznik (2):
>   security_manager: Don't manipulate domain XML in
>     virDomainDefGetSecurityLabelDef
>   security: Don't add seclabel of type none if there's already a
>     seclabel
> 
>  src/conf/domain_conf.c          | 56 +++++++++++------------------------------
>  src/conf/domain_conf.h          |  7 ++++--
>  src/libvirt_private.syms        |  1 -
>  src/security/security_manager.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  src/security/security_selinux.c |  8 ++++--
>  5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 

Ping? I think this should go in the upcoming release since it's a bug fix.

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]