Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] NUMA: cleanup for numa related codes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013/03/18 17:34, Osier Yang wrote:
> On 2013年03月18日 17:04, Gao feng wrote:
>> Intend to reduce the redundant code,use virNumaSetupMemoryPolicy
>> to replace virLXCControllerSetupNUMAPolicy and
>> qemuProcessInitNumaMemoryPolicy.
>>
>> This patch also moves the numa related codes to the
>> file virnuma.c and virnuma.h
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng<gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in |  15 ------
>>   src/conf/domain_conf.c       |  25 +++------
>>   src/conf/domain_conf.h       |  17 +-----
>>   src/libvirt_private.syms     |   9 ++--
>>   src/lxc/lxc_controller.c     | 114 +--------------------------------------
>>   src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c       |   6 +--
>>   src/qemu/qemu_driver.c       |   2 +-
>>   src/qemu/qemu_process.c      | 121 +----------------------------------------
>>   src/util/virnuma.c           | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   src/util/virnuma.h           |  45 ++++++++++++++++
>>   tools/virsh-domain.c         |   4 +-
>>   11 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 291 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git PATCH v3include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in b/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
>> index f6a7aff..b3bfd1d 100644
>> --- PATCH v3include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in	
>> +++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
>> @@ -1762,21 +1762,6 @@ typedef enum {
>>   /* Manage numa parameters */
>>
>>   /**
>> - * virDomainNumatuneMemMode:
>> - * Representation of the various modes in the<numatune>  element of
>> - * a domain.
>> - */
>> -typedef enum {
>> -    VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_STRICT      = 0,
>> -    VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_PREFERRED   = 1,
>> -    VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_INTERLEAVE  = 2,
>> -
>> -#ifdef VIR_ENUM_SENTINELS
>> -    VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_LAST /* This constant is subject to change */
>> -#endif
>> -} virDomainNumatuneMemMode;
>> -
> 
> NACK, this will introduce backward compatibility problems. They should
> *not* be changed or removed.
> 

So what we should do is just move them from domain_conf to virnuma?
The rename will cause compatibility problems.
I am right?

Thanks!

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]