On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:00:43PM +0800, Alex Jia wrote: > It seems the broadcast address parameter is not optional now, if users haven't > specified the broadcast address to the network interface then a segfault will > be raised. > > This patch is just a temporary solution to avoid segfault, and with the patch, > users will get a expected error "Unable to parse networks: Unable to parse > broadcast address (null)", of course, a better patch should automatically > generate a broadcast address according to actual ip address. But AFAIK, > the IPv6 hasn't defined broadcast address, so it needs to do address protocol > judgement firstly, I will try to implement it later. I think that if you don't explicitly set a broadcast address, then the kernel will set one on the device based on its address/netmask. So I think you can just allow a NULL bcast value everywhere in virt-sandbox code. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list