From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Normally libvirtd should run with a SELinux label
system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
If a user manually runs libvirtd though, it is sometimes
possible to get into a situation where it is running
system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
The SELinux security driver isn't expecting this and can't
parse the security label since it lacks the ':c0.c1023' part
causing it to complain
internal error Cannot parse sensitivity level in s0
This updates the parser to cope with this, so if no category
is present, libvirtd will hardcode the equivalent of c0.c1023.
Now this won't work if SELinux is in Enforcing mode, but that's
not an issue, because the user can only get into this problem
if in Permissive mode. This means they can now start VMs in
Permissive mode without hitting that parsing error
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/security/security_selinux.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
tests/securityselinuxtest.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/security/security_selinux.c b/src/security/security_selinux.c
index bfbb006..ced2b12 100644
--- a/src/security/security_selinux.c
+++ b/src/security/security_selinux.c
@@ -159,6 +159,20 @@ virSecuritySELinuxMCSFind(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr,
return mcs;
}
+
+/*
+ * This needs to cope with several styles of range
+ *
+ * system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0
+ * system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0-s0
+ * system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
+ *
+ * In the first two cases, we'll assume c0.c1023 for
+ * the category part, since that's what we're really
+ * interested in. This won't work in Enforcing mode,
+ * but will prevent libvirtd breaking in Permissive
+ * mode when run with a wierd procss label.
+ */
static int
virSecuritySELinuxMCSGetProcessRange(char **sens,
int *catMin,
@@ -166,7 +180,8 @@ virSecuritySELinuxMCSGetProcessRange(char **sens,
{
security_context_t ourSecContext = NULL;
context_t ourContext = NULL;
- char *cat, *tmp;
+ char *cat = NULL;
+ char *tmp;
int ret = -1;
if (getcon_raw(&ourSecContext) < 0) {
@@ -186,20 +201,25 @@ virSecuritySELinuxMCSGetProcessRange(char **sens,
goto cleanup;
}
- /* Find and blank out the category part */
- if (!(tmp = strchr(*sens, ':'))) {
- virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("Cannot parse sensitivity level in %s"),
- *sens);
- goto cleanup;
+ /* Find and blank out the category part (if any) */
+ tmp = strchr(*sens, ':');
+ if (tmp) {
+ *tmp = '\0';
+ cat = tmp + 1;
}
- *tmp = '\0';
- cat = tmp + 1;
/* Find and blank out the sensitivity upper bound */
if ((tmp = strchr(*sens, '-')))
*tmp = '\0';
/* sens now just contains the sensitivity lower bound */
+ /* If there was no category part, just assume c0.c1024 */
+ if (!cat) {
+ *catMin = 0;
+ *catMax = 1024;
+ ret = 0;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
/* Find & extract category min */
tmp = cat;
if (tmp[0] != 'c') {
diff --git a/tests/securityselinuxtest.c b/tests/securityselinuxtest.c
index ba00010..da8a12f 100644
--- a/tests/securityselinuxtest.c
+++ b/tests/securityselinuxtest.c
@@ -297,6 +297,18 @@ mymain(void)
} while (0)
DO_TEST_GEN_LABEL("dynamic unconfined, s0, c0.c1023",
+ "unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0",
+ true, NULL, NULL,
+ "unconfined_u", "unconfined_r", "object_r",
+ "svirt_t", "svirt_image_t",
+ 0, 0, 0, 1023);
+ DO_TEST_GEN_LABEL("dynamic unconfined, s0, c0.c1023",
+ "unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0",
+ true, NULL, NULL,
+ "unconfined_u", "unconfined_r", "object_r",
+ "svirt_t", "svirt_image_t",
+ 0, 0, 0, 1023);
+ DO_TEST_GEN_LABEL("dynamic unconfined, s0, c0.c1023",
"unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023",
true, NULL, NULL,
"unconfined_u", "unconfined_r", "object_r",
--
1.8.1.4
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list