Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Il 27/02/2013 17:19, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto: >>> > >>> > If it is meant as a prototype only, and the final command-line syntax >>> > would be with repeated keys, that's okay. I think that Eduardo/Markus/I >>> > are focusing on the user interface, you're focusing in the implementation. >>> > >>> > In the meanwhile, however, it seems to me that Eduardo can use >>> > QemuOptsVisitor---which can also hide the details and provide type safety. >> Whatever I use to implement it, I still need to know how the >> command-line syntax will look like, because we need to tell libvirt >> developers how they should write the QEMU command-line. > > I don't think any syntax makes sense except cpus=A,cpus=B. How we > implement it is another story. Agreed on both counts. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list