Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] security_dac: Remember owner prior chown() and restore on relabel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27.02.2013 11:21, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:08:40PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Currently, if we label a file to match qemu process DAC label, we
>> do not store the original owner anywhere. So when relabeling
>> back, the only option we have is to relabel to root:root
>> which is obviously wrong.
>>
>> However, bare remembering is not enough. We need to keep track of
>> how many times we labeled a file so only the last restore
>> chown()-s file back to the original owner.
> 
> Your patches don't deal with this scenario correctly I'm afraid.
> A shared file may be on NFS, so simply ref-counting inside
> libvirtd doesn't cut it. We need a ref count visible to all
> libvirtd instances that can see the file.  My thought is that
> we ought to make use of an extended attribute for recording
> the ref count and original ownership.
> 
> Daniel
> 

Okay, but I think we should not deal with NFS at all. If a disk is
shared libvirt should not event try to label it. And if so, then
definitely not relabel it back.

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]