On 02/26/2013 05:42 AM, Philipp Hahn wrote: > Add format/@type entries to examples to show what the text is talking > about. > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > docs/storage.html.in | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > +++ b/docs/storage.html.in > @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ > <name>virtimages</name> > <source> > <device path="/dev/VolGroup00/VirtImages"/> > + <format type="auto"/> > </source> Question - is type="auto" safe, or does it risk the CVE where a raw image can be abused by a guest in a manner to make libvirt mis-detect the storage as some other type, and potentially causing libvirt to follow a backing chain outside of the guest's permitted reach? Depending on the answer, either this is safe to push as-is into 1.0.3, or we should revisit all mention of type="auto" to clarify the danger of relying on probing. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list