Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Il 26/02/2013 20:35, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: >>>> >> >>>> >> See also discussion on multi-valued keys in command line option >>>> >> arguments and config files in v1 thread. Hopefully we can reach a >>>> >> conclusion soon, and then we'll see whether this patch is what we want. >>> > >>> > Yeah, let's drop this patch by now. I am starting to be convinced that >>> > "cpus=A,cpus=B,cpus=C" is the best approach. It is not pretty, but at >>> > least it uses generic parser code instead of yet another ad-hoc >>> > parser. >> No, we cannot rely on this behavior. We had to do it to support >> backwards compat with netdev but it should not be used anywhere else. > > We chose a config format (git's) because it was a good match for > QemuOpts, and multiple-valued operations are well supported by that > config format; see git-config(1). There is no reason to consider it a > backwards-compatibility hack. Seconded. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list