Il 26/02/2013 15:04, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
>> > For me, the INI way to do multi-valued keys is still fine.
> Having multiple-valued keys (cpus=A,cpus=B,cpus=C) seems like the best
> intermediate solution while we don't have a decent generic syntax.
Even more so since:
1) we already support it for -net;
2) our config file format is not a random INI variant, it's explicitly
based on git's config file format, and it supports multiple-valued keys.
For example here is a stanza of my .git/config file.
[remote "mirror"]
url = git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git
pushurl = git@xxxxxxxxxx:bonzini/qemu.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/mirror/*
push = +refs/heads/*:refs/heads/*
push = +refs/heads/master:refs/heads/integration
push = +refs/remotes/origin/master:refs/heads/master
push = +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*
Paolo
> Except that Anthony doesn't like it.
> Anthony, care to explain why exactly you don't want it?
>
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list