On 02/25/13 10:42, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 02/23/13 00:33, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/21/2013 07:47 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
This patch adds basic configuration support for the RNG device suporting
s/suporting/supporting/
the virtio model with the "random" and "egd" backend types as described
in the schema in the previous patch.
---
Notes:
Version 2:
- fix a ton of memory leaks (I assumed that virXMLGetProp
returns static strings)
- Add new device type to even more places
- Fix error message c&p error
- Fix memleak in RNGDef free func
...
@@ -10601,6 +10734,22 @@ virDomainDefParseXML(virCapsPtr caps,
}
}
+ /* Parse the RNG device */
+ if ((n = virXPathNodeSet("./devices/rng", ctxt, &nodes)) < 0)
+ goto error;
+
+ if (n > 1) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
+ _("only a single RNG device is supported"));
Is this an inherent limit of qemu? For that matter, is it an inherent
limit, and no hypervisor can ever support more than one? In the bare
metal case, can't you plug in multiple rng hardware dongles?
AFAIK qemu is able to support multiple RNG devices but I didn't find
that particularly useful. I will follow up with a patch that will add
support for more than one RNG device, although I don't think it will be
used much.
I hacked up the patch to add support for multiple RNG's. qemu appears to
support the device just fine.
As of guest support it seems that it triggers a 100% reproducible kernel
panic on linux guest when attempting to read from a machine with two
virtio-rng devices. I filed a bug to track this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915335
Peter
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list