On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:04:07PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 02/19/13 13:35, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> >This flag may be used with migration APIs to request compression of
> >migration data.
> >---
> > include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in | 1 +
> > tools/virsh-domain.c | 8 ++++++++
> > tools/virsh.pod | 6 ++++--
> > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in b/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
> >index ad30cd0..eda9e12 100644
> >--- a/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
> >+++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
> >@@ -1187,6 +1187,7 @@ typedef enum {
> > * when supported */
> > VIR_MIGRATE_UNSAFE = (1 << 9), /* force migration even if it is considered unsafe */
> > VIR_MIGRATE_OFFLINE = (1 << 10), /* offline migrate */
> >+ VIR_MIGRATE_COMPRESSED = (1 << 11), /* compress data during migration */
>
> I'm just wondering if this is enough future proof if somebody
> invents other migration compression methods. Well but that's
> something our future selves will need to worry about.
I think this is ok as it is.
> ACK (unless somebody else speaks until I'm finished)
ACK
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list